The converseing of eyewitness is a very sensitive process that consume to be carried out with c ar and logic if it is to get ahead in its aims. However, it has been shown that the reposition is fallible and can fail when it comes to refunding stored tuition in that it recalls false information about events that didnt really happen. This consequently poses a problem when eyewitnesses are interviewed as they can a lot recall information that is false and and so delay the investigation. bartlett adduce that memories are reconstructions in accordance with a abstract and that they are not videos. Loftus also made similar findings to this; he utter that the fund is influenced by the questions asked as memories are reconstructions. This therefore shows that in order to improve the random nature of interviews the preceding(prenominal) mental principles need to be applied. In light of this, Tulving and Thompson (1973) investigated the convert specificity principle. They f ix that due to memories being encoded, stored and the retrieved it is easier to retrieve a retentiveness when you are in the same worked up or visible state as when you encoded it.
Therefore, in a cognitive interview enquire the interviewee to re ?create mentally the physical and emotional dorsumground of the incident may jog their memory and so they testament be able to give a more terminate description of what happened. Police may also take them top to the scene of the crime and try and reconstruct the incident in a Crimewatch style to see if this sets off any memory triggers. Loftus and Collins (1975) also came up with a model that by chance a! pplied to interviewing techniques. The spreading activation model shows that concepts in the colossal term memory are linked semantically i.e. by means of semantic nets. Therefore to improve the interviewing techniques... If you privation to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment